Plantwide dictionary definition

These clarifications should provide certifying authorities with the information and tools necessary to act on certification requests consistent with section 401 and within the scope of certification provided in this final rule, reducing the need to remedy deficient conditions or denials. The EPA has concluded in the final rule that if a federal licensing or permitting agency wishes to create procedures whereby certifying authorities may remedy deficient conditions or denials, it may do so in its own water quality certification regulations. Such procedures may not be used to exceed the one-year statutory limit on the reasonable period of time.

What does plantwide mean in accounting?

What is a Plantwide Overhead Rate? The plantwide overhead rate is a single overhead rate that a company uses to allocate all of its manufacturing overhead costs to products or cost objects. It is most commonly used in smaller entities with simple cost structures.

This combination of understanding, maturity and tactical skill, when developed and deployed properly, enables performance improvements through the identification and elimination of “waste”…Lean. For an understanding of Lean Horizons Consulting’s methodology for deploying a Lean transformation, please consult the about us and our work sections of this site. With no bright-line standard for determining the physical distance that may constitute adjacency, EPA’s determinations have included examinations of whether one or more facilities are otherwise functionally related through numerous “fine-grained” analyses. In sum, EPA clarified that it would interpret “adjacent” to include properties that are not physically touching – including those that are separated by a right of way or other similar separation – only when they are otherwise in reasonably proximity to one another. Finally, EPA noted that state and local air permitting agencies with approved NSR programs are not required to adopt EPA’s Project Aggregation interpretation. First, sources and permitting authorities should aggregate projects that are “substantially related.” The factors that should be considered in evaluating whether projects are substantially related include factors indicative of the technical or economic dependence of projects. EPA specifically rejected a broader approach to aggregation that would consider as related any projects that contribute to the source’s overall basic purpose.

Free Vibration

The federal agency will consider the jurisdiction’s and the EPA’s recommendations, and any additional evidence presented at the hearing, and “shall condition such license or permit in such manner as may be necessary to insure compliance with the applicable water quality requirements” of the neighboring jurisdiction. If the conditions cannot ensure compliance, the federal agency shall not issue the license or permit. Protect the water quality of federally regulated waters within their borders in collaboration with federal agencies. As described in greater detail below, section 401 envisions a robust State and Tribal role in the federal licensing or permitting proceedings, including those in which local authority may otherwise be preempted Plantwide dictionary definition by federal law. Section 401 also places important limitations on how that role may be implemented to maintain an efficient process, consistent with the overall cooperative federalism construct established by the CWA, as explained below in section II.F.1 of this notice. A few commenters supported the proposed requirement that federal agencies substantively review water quality certifications and asserted that such reviews would bring clarity and certainty to the water quality certification process. These commenters also supported the proposed authority for federal agencies to determine that constructive waiver occurred for certifications, conditions, and denials that failed to comply with procedural requirements of the rule.

The charge amplifier is sensitive to the amount of electric charge generated by the accelerometer rather than the voltage the accelerometer generates. Because the charge is independent of the cable attached to the accelerometer, the sensitivity of the accelerometer does not vary with cable length as it does when using a voltage amplifier.

Controlled Exports (CCL & USML)

Consistent with the proposal, this final rule includes procedural requirements and timeframes for action that will provide transparency and regulatory certainty for the Agency and project proponents. However, in response to public comments and to increase clarity, the Agency has provided enhancements to the final rule text. Some commenters supported the alternative interpretation presented in the proposed rule to the effect that only the CWA sections enumerated in section 401 may be used as a basis for a water quality certification denial, while section 401 lists the considerations for applying conditions to a granted water quality certification. These commenters stated that this approach reflects the plain language of the CWA, and therefore that “any other appropriate requirement of State law” could be considered only when applying conditions to a water quality certification and cannot be grounds for a denial. Other commenters stated that section 401 and section 401 do not and have never been interpreted to have different scopes. After considering all public comments on this and other issues, the Agency is not finalizing the proposed alternative interpretation. The EPA believes that interpreting section 401 as establishing different standards for issuing a denial under section 401 and for requiring conditions under section 401 is likely to lead to implementation challenges, including confusion by project proponents, certifying authorities and federal licensing and permitting agencies.

Id.; see also cases discussed at section III.G of this notice affirming a role for federal agencies to confirm whether certifications comply with the requirements of section 401. The EPA also notifies neighboring jurisdictions when the Administrator determines that a discharge may affect the quality of such jurisdictions’ waters. Although section 401 certification authority lies with the jurisdiction where the discharge originates, a neighboring jurisdiction whose water quality is potentially affected by the discharge may have an opportunity to raise objections to a certification issued for a federal license or permit. Where the EPA Administrator determines that a discharge subject to section 401 “may affect” the water quality of a neighboring jurisdiction, the EPA is required to notify that other jurisdiction. If the neighboring jurisdiction determines that the discharge “will affect” the quality of its waters in violation of a water quality requirement of that jurisdiction, it may notify the EPA and the federal licensing or permitting agency of its objection to the license or permit. It may also request a hearing on its objection with the federal licensing or permitting agency. At such a hearing, section 401 requires the EPA to submit its evaluation and recommendations with respect to the objection.